* feat(region-routing): P1 tagging + region_routes primitive + read/write API + preview launcher - config.py: add Coverage.region_tagging (bool=False); add RegionRouteMatrix dataclass (enabled, cells) above NotificationsConfig; add region_routes field to NotificationsConfig; add explicit hydration branch for region_routes in _dict_to_dataclass mirroring destinations pattern. - coverage_area.py: add MonitoringArea.name (str|None=None, frozen); update areas_from_config to preserve name; refactor inline geom extraction from classify_event_areas into shared _event_geom_json helper; add matching_area_names(geom_json, areas)->list[str] (additive, all named matches, config-order, deduped; gate unchanged); add event_region_names convenience wrapper. - coverage_filter.py: add region_tagging ctor kwarg; stamp event.region/ regions before the gate when region_tagging=True and areas non-empty and not event.regions (never clobbers satpass preset). - pipeline/__init__.py: wire region_tagging into CoverageFilter construction. - notification_routes.py: add GET /notifications/regions (named coverage area names, config-order, deduped); GET /notifications/region-routing (matrix as JSON); POST /notifications/region-routing (explicit RMW — only region_routes changes, toggles/rules/destinations survive). - scripts/preview_dashboard.py: mesh-free launcher — dashboard API only, no mesh connector, no broadcast loop; vite runs separately. All 87 coverage tests pass; 300 total pass; 6 pre-existing failures unchanged (adapter config count mismatch + MeshCore EventType.NEW_CONTACT). * feat(region-routing): manual region x family matrix editor page Adds RegionRoutingMatrix.tsx — a plain editor over the region_routes config primitive. Rows = families (via useFamilies()), cols = regions (from GET /api/notifications/regions). Each cell exposes MT channel (ChannelPicker single + includeDisabled), MC channel name (text input), min_severity select (routine/priority/critical/immediate), and an enabled checkbox. Only cells where MT or MC is set are included in the sparse POST payload. Master enable toggle maps to top-level enabled. MT budget guard warns when more than 7 distinct MT indices are in use. Sticky family column; horizontal scroll for wide region sets. Registers route /region-routing in App.tsx and adds "Region Routing" nav entry (Map icon) under the Meshtastic section in Layout.tsx, immediately after Routing. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(region-routing): regions endpoint reads saved (disk) coverage so routing columns are dynamic without a bot restart; preview reloads config after writes * feat(routing): unify MT/MC routing into per-family cards; region routing as an in-card expand; remove rules/destinations UI + standalone page * refactor(routing): move Meshtastic Routing from /notifications to /meshtastic/routing (mirror /meshcore/routing); redirect legacy path * feat(region-routing): dispatcher honors region_routes matrix (authoritative-on-match, per-region cooldown, per-channel dedup); non-matrix path unchanged Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(region-routing): matrix dedup key must match boot-restore 2-tuple form (prevents restart re-broadcast flood); regression test --------- Co-authored-by: Matt Johnson <mj@k7zvx.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
5.6 KiB
ts-interface-checker
Runtime library to validate data against TypeScript interfaces.
This package is the runtime support for validators created by ts-interface-builder. It allows validating data, such as parsed JSON objects received over the network, or parsed JSON or YAML files, to check if they satisfy a TypeScript interface, and to produce informative error messages if they do not.
Installation
npm install --save-dev ts-interface-builder
npm install --save ts-interface-checker
Usage
Suppose you have a TypeScript file defining an interface:
// foo.ts
interface Square {
size: number;
color?: string;
}
The first step is to generate some code for runtime checks:
`npm bin`/ts-interface-builder foo.ts
It produces a file like this:
// foo-ti.js
import * as t from "ts-interface-checker";
export const Square = t.iface([], {
"size": "number",
"color": t.opt("string"),
});
...
Now at runtime, to check if a value satisfies the Square interface:
import fooTI from "./foo-ti";
import {createCheckers} from "ts-interface-checker";
const {Square} = createCheckers(fooTI);
Square.check({size: 1}); // OK
Square.check({size: 1, color: "green"}); // OK
Square.check({color: "green"}); // Fails with "value.size is missing"
Square.check({size: 4, color: 5}); // Fails with "value.color is not a string"
Note that ts-interface-builder is only needed for the build-time step, and
ts-interface-checker is needed at runtime. That's why the recommendation is to npm-install the
former using --save-dev flag and the latter using --save.
Checking method calls
If you have an interface with methods, you can validate method call arguments and return values:
// greet.ts
interface Greeter {
greet(name: string): string;
}
After generating the runtime code, you can now check calls like:
import greetTI from "./greet-ti";
import {createCheckers} from "ts-interface-checker";
const {Greeter} = createCheckers(greetTI);
Greeter.methodArgs("greet").check(["Bob"]); // OK
Greeter.methodArgs("greet").check([17]); // Fails with "value.name is not a string"
Greeter.methodArgs("greet").check([]); // Fails with "value.name is missing"
Greeter.methodResult("greet").check("hello"); // OK
Greeter.methodResult("greet").check(null); // Fails with "value is not a string"
Type suites
If one type refers to a type defined in another file, you need to tell the interface checker about
all type names when you call createCheckers(). E.g. given
// color.ts
export type Color = RGB | string;
export type RGB = [number, number, number];
// shape.ts
import {Color} from "./color";
export interface Square {
size: number;
color?: Color;
}
the produced files color-ti.ts and shape-ti.ts do not automatically refer to each other, but
expect you to relate them in createCheckers() call:
import color from "./color-ti";
import shape from "./shape-ti";
import {createCheckers} from "ts-interface-checker";
const {Square} = createCheckers(shape, color); // Pass in all required type suites.
Square.check({size: 1, color: [255,255,255]});
Strict checking
You may check that data contains no extra properties. Note that it is not generally recommended as it this prevents backward compatibility: if you add new properties to an interface, then older code with strict checks will not accept them.
Following on the example above:
Square.strictCheck({size: 1, color: [255,255,255], bg: "blue"}); // Fails with value.bg is extraneous
Square.strictCheck({size: 1, color: [255,255,255,0.5]}); // Fails with ...value.color[3] is extraneous
Type guards
Standard Checker objects do the type checking logic, but are unable to make the TypeScript
compiler aware that an object of unknown type implements a certain interface.
Basic code:
const unk: unknown = {size: 1, color: "green"};
// Type is unknown, so TypeScript will not let you access the members.
console.log(unk.size); // Error: "Object is of type 'unknown'"
With a Checker available:
import fooTI from "./foo-ti";
import {createCheckers} from "ts-interface-checker";
const {Square} = createCheckers(fooTI);
const unk: unknown = {size: 1, color: "green"};
if (Square.test(unk)) {
// unk does implement Square, but TypeScript is not aware of it.
console.log(unk.size); // Error: "Object is of type 'unknown'"
}
To enable type guard functionality on the existing test, and strictTest functions, Checker
objects should be cast to CheckerT<> using the appropriate type.
Using CheckerT<>:
import {Square} from "./foo";
import fooTI from "./foo-ti";
import {createCheckers, CheckerT} from "ts-interface-checker";
const {Square} = createCheckers(fooTI) as {Square: CheckerT<Square>};
const unk: unknown = {size: 1, color: "green"};
if (Square.test(unk)) {
// TypeScript is now aware that unk implements Square, and allows member access.
console.log(unk.size);
}
Type assertions
CheckerT<> will eventually support type assertions using the check and strictCheck functions,
however, this feature is not yet fully working in TypeScript.